As many as 13% of hard-pressed families across Woking face being left worse off when the Government end the uplift to Universal Credit next month.

New data from the Joseph Rowntree Foundation exposes the true nature of how badly some areas will be hit by the £20 Universal Credit cut which is opposed by Will Forster and the local Lib Dems.

The Lib Dems have criticised the Conservative Leader of Surrey County Council for unilaterally writing to the Government asking for a County Deal for Surrey.

On 10th August, Councillor Tim Oliver wrote to the Housing, Communities and Local Government Secretary, Robert Jenrick, formally registering Surrey County Council's interest in more powers from Central Government as part of a County Deal for Surrey.

The Lib Dems have challenged Surrey County Council over failures to answer data protection and freedom of information requests from local residents within legal time limits.

During the last Cabinet meeting, Lib Dem Group Leader Will Forster asked how many enquiries were not responded to in the required time.

Woking Lib Dems are calling on the Government to make a more ambitious commitment to resettle refugees fleeing the Taliban, and to give Woking Borough Council extra funding to house and support them here.

The Lib Dems have slammed the Government's commitment to resettle just 5,000 Afghan refugees across the UK over the next year, saying it "falls woefully short" of what is needed in response to the unfolding humanitarian crisis.

The Good Law Project is taking legal action against Surrey County Council for sending children in care outside of Surrey.

Lib Dem Group Leader on Surrey County Council, Will Forster, said:

"This news comes as no surprise to my Lib Dem colleagues and I - we have regularly challenged the Council on its delivery of services to vulnerable children over many years, that it is now facing a legal challenge for failing in its statutory duty."

Liberal Democrats' succeeded in securing agreement for a full review of Woking Council finances at last week's Council meeting.

The first Council business meeting since May's elections gave unanimous support for a review to look at all aspects of Woking's finances.

"Liberal Democrats made a commitment to a full financial review in our election manifesto. "As a constructive opposition we put forward proposals for a review of council finances and I am delighted that this was supported by Council" said Liberal Democrat leader Cllr Ann-Marie Barker.

The Lib Dems have secured support for measures that will result in all care leavers in Surrey being exempt from paying Council Tax from next April.

In 2018, the Lib Dems won unanimous backing at Surrey County Council for a motion to exempt care leavers from paying tax until they are 25. Ten of Surrey's eleven Borough and District Councils have also already taken this step, Woking Borough Council was the first - and now Tandridge District Council has finally agreed to move into line with the rest of Surrey.

Lib Dem Group Leader on Surrey County Council, Will Forster, said:

"I am delighted that the aim of my motion will finally be realised, and all young care leavers in Surrey will be exempt from paying Council Tax. These young people have often faced significant challenges growing up, yet they leave home earlier and have less support than other young people. Without the family backup most young people receive, care leavers often struggle to juggle their household bills and make ends meet."

"Although taking care Leavers out of the Council Tax system is no silver bullet, it will be a strong step in the right direction and will help these young people make a successful transition out of care."

Lib Dem Councillors on Surrey's Police and Crime Panel have criticised the Surrey Police and Crime Commissioner for appointing a £53,550 a year Deputy against the views of the cross-party Police and Crime Panel.

The Conservative Police and Crime Commissioner, Lisa Townsend, and her proposed Deputy Police and Crime Commissioner, Ellie Vesey-Thompson, recently attended a confirmation hearing with the Police and Crime Panel and answered questions from Panel members on her suitability for the role.

Miss Vesey-Thompson admitted she had limited experience of policing, but that she would build on her experience of working with young people. Asked about her longer-term career plans, Miss Vesey-Thompson said she intended to return to law school after her role ended. However, she would continue to be involved in political campaigning for the Tories during the appointment.

During the confirmation hearing, the Commissioner told the Panel she had been under no obligation to tell voters of the proposed appointment during the election campaign, despite deciding to appoint Miss Vesey-Thompson at an early stage. She had not undertaken any formal recruitment process, in reliance on the exemption in Government rules for political appointments.

Following this hearing, the Panel wrote to the Commissioner recommending against the appointment of the proposed Deputy, however she decided to press ahead with the appointment regardless of the Panel's concerns.

Lib Dem Councillor Will Forster, Woking's representative on the Police and Crime Panel, said:

"I think the decision to press ahead with appointing a Deputy Commissioner, against the advice of the Panel, is wrong. It creates a further crisis of legitimacy for the Conservatives' deeply flawed and derided PCC model."

"The new Commissioner failed to tell voters of the proposed appointment during the election campaign and has relied on an exemption in Government rules which means there is no obligation to appoint a Deputy on merit, and no restriction on their continuing political activities."

"£53,550 is a huge salary for a Tory activist with no senior management or policing experience, which will come out of Surrey's police budget, paid for by council taxpayers. This public money could have been spent on actually policing, but instead it will be used to fund the political career of another Conservative Party politician."

Woking's Conservative MP recently voted in the House of Commons to support the Government's cut to foreign aid, breaking a manifesto promise.

MPs were given the option to vote between restoring the Government's commitment to spending 0.7% of Gross National Income on foreign aid, and a so-called compromise that would see the commitment return only after the arrival of economic conditions that, according to former Prime Minister Theresa May, may not come for years, and, according to the House of Commons library, have only been met once this century.

Woking's MP, Jonathan Lord, voted for the Government's proposal, risking the cuts to foreign aid becoming permanent, despite standing on a promise to maintain the 0.7% commitment at the last General Election.

Lib Dem Spokesperson for Woking, Will Forster, said:

"I am shocked and appalled our Tory MP in Woking voted against the world's poorest, and broke a promise to their constituents as they did so. The Government's cuts to foreign aid will do great harm to those who rely on our support."

"The UK has a reputation as a country that does its bit to help others, but that reputation is now in jeopardy as we turn our back on the world's poorest and most vulnerable. These cuts are short-sighted and wrong - from tackling climate change and terrorism to preventing future pandemics, the damage of these cuts will be felt here in the UK and across the world."

"At the last General Election, both Jonathan Lord and I stood on manifesto promises to support the UK's commitment to the world's poorest, and I am proud that my Lib Dem colleagues in Parliament stood by that promise. I know many Woking residents will now rightly question whether the Conservatives can be trusted to do as they say."

The Conservative MP for Woking, Jonathan Lord, is under fire for voting against a new law to tackle pet theft.

In a vote on Monday 5th July, Woking's MP was among 354 Tories who blocked efforts to make pet theft a crime in its own right, with stiffer penalties for offenders.

Under the current law, pets are treated as property, with no distinction between a family's beloved dog and a stolen bike. Meanwhile, pet theft is up 250% in the past year as the value of pets has soared during lockdown.